|THE CRAVE GAMING CHANNEL|
· TGS 2013
· Indie Submissions
· Release Dates
· Message Forums
· Staff Bios
· Jobs Listing
· Fan Art
· Indie Corner
· Sound Test
· Saving Throw
· RPG Backtrack
· Please Be Excited
· Dialog Trees
· RPG Elements
by Laura Cullem
The advancement of video games has reached a point where the press is finally beginning to consider them a legitimate form of media. Most newspapers carry a regular feature that reviews new games -- if only weekly or so -- and profit margins prove that, at least economically, video games are a force with which to be reckoned. The most daring and liberal among journalists may even suggest that, someday, a video game might reach the plateau of "art." Of course, they hastily add, it will be a long time -- if ever -- before games can convey such universal truths or provoke such acute emotional reactions.
RPGamers know better.
In fact, RPGs already meet the criteria for being art -- or at least come closer than works of other media do. RPGs have a distinct advantage in this area that movies, television shows, other games, and even other books do not: their fundamental premise is the intimate sharing of someone's life.
Take Final Fantasy VII, which -- whether they adored it or loathed it -- a good portion of gamers finished. For fifty hours or so, they quite literally played the role of Cloud -- and to a lesser extent, various other characters. Fifty hours, spread over several months, is a long time. Fifty hours as knowing, playing, being someone else can have a profound effect on one's psyche.
It's no coincidence, then, that many RPGamers can remember what part they were in a game when they hear that segment's particular music -- as if they had lived that part. Nor is the hullabaloo over Aeris's death surprising. After all, players -- even if they were not too fond of her -- knew Aeris. They spent a great deal of time with her, they heard her conversations, they witnessed her past -- they saw her die. Character deaths in RPGs, so much more painful than character deaths in other forms of media, are just so agonizing because the player is intimately close to the character. This is the key to RPGs as art.
After all, one of the main aspirations of literature -- in particular, works written in the first person narrator -- is to have the characters appeal to the audience, to obtain emotional attachments, so the events of the plot have that much more of an impact. What RPGamers (and not very many other people) know is that RPGs are, by their very nature, ideal for this. Many authors labor over the creation of a character so three-dimensional that a reader can, if desired, walk in the character's shoes; role-playing games were created for this very purpose.
Perhaps the plots and character development of RPGs are not yet sophisticated enough to reach the level of art. However, if the press scoffs at the simple notion of it, they should scoff more incredulously at the thought of movies and television shows being so -- since their characters are often more stereotyped, their plots often more cliched; additionally, they lack the RPG's fundamental character closeness.
Don't worry, though. It won't take that long before RPGs fully realize their enormous potential of character-player intimacy, and the press fully realizes that this genre's advantage has made it artistic for a long time. Until then, we have our games, our characters, and ourselves.
Quite apart from that, however, there's very little to be said - it's a good, solid editorial, with no spelling or grammar mistakes that I could see. It flows fairly nicely, although there's a couple too many pauses in the middle of the editorial, which rather breaks it up a little too much.
All in all, a nice, heartwarming editorial, though many feel it'll be a long time before the press work out that computer games are a valid entertainment and art form.
|© 1998-2013 RPGamer All Rights Reserved|