[03.23.2000] - Remind me never to open my mouth about the presence or lack of editorials in my mailbox ever again. As soon as I said that last time, I had 10 editorials in my box. That's a lot. But it means that you all get to read them (yay). Also, I'll be back at school, doing the same old stuff on Sunday night probably, so then you will probably get more frequent updates (as they take less work there).

I was told that some people were having trouble accessing the page as soon as I updated because of trouble with cached copies of editorials.html. So I adopted a new naming strategy, which also means that when 12.14.99 - 2.26.00 or so get archived, I can archive things by update and editorial.

I'm still trying to figure out a good way to organize the editorials. Does anyone out there have a suggestion? It just seems like there's too much overlap currently, so I keep changing things around. So if you have a genius idea, then please please please tell me. I have no idea if people just read through them or not. The only problem I can forsee with the one for this week, is that rebuttals, unless clearly marked in the title, may be hard to spot.

Also, I've decided to post 1 editorial a week which doesn't quite make 100% sense in my mind. I'll post that in the section marked, "Rebuttal Fodder" for you to do just that. However, for fairness sake, I will only print the best editorial that hits on the most rebuttal points. This does not mean the editorial is terrible (this week's is very well written), it just means that I think the logic is flawed. Please don't take it personally, I only do it because I love you.

So that's about it I think. You get 10 editorials arranged in the flavour-of-the-week style. I hope you enjoy.

  - Joshua "Darien" Maciel
Anyone out there with pagemaker and a Japanese font, add the kanji "Kami Kyujo" or "Jyoshyua" (just do Kanji replace thingy) and add it to my sig, send it to me, and I'll love you forever.

Submit!
(Either to my will, or an editorial)