[03.06.2000] - Another couple days, another bunch of editorials. The first thing I'd like to do is to thanks each and every one of you who submitted editorials over the past week. First of all, they have been of incredible quality, and believe it or not, there have been only two that I can't/won't post. Second of all, I'd say 80% of you actually sent me editorials in HTML. That lets me get the updates up quicker, and allows you to have fuller control over what you want it to look like (in the sense that you can make things bold, add applicable e-mail links, etc.).

In other news, I have two things in the works for you guys. The first is a new look for the editorials, which should make everything easier to find and read (but I'm not going to set a definite date. I don't love HTML like some). Secondly, I plan to create some sort of editorial feature, a featured topic, or something of the sort, and try to give those bereft of ideas something to write about, and hopefully have fun with. And goshdarnit, sorry that the categories aren't exactly 100% accurate. I'll change those, honest!

I have seven new editorials this week, including two excellent editorials agreeing with Mr. Crislip. For all you who are seeking a good topic for debate, just scroll down to "The Action Based Character" by Paul Langworthy. Much to my amazement, he's done something I haven't seen done yet -- add fresh new material to the "Old School vs. New School" debate. Of course, these are less than half of the editorials, and if they weren't worth a read, they wouldn't be up here. So stop reading my ramblings, and get to the tootsie roll center of the editorials.

  - Joshua "Darien" Maciel
If you think that sig is boring, you're darn tootin' :D